
The Draft Telangana Gig and Platform Workers (Registration, Social Security, and Welfare) Bill, 2025 |
|
||
Key Features
|
Key Issues and Analysis
|
|
|
The Draft Bill was circulated by the Labour Department, Government of Telangana, on April 15, 2025. It seeks to regulate gig and platform work, and ensure protection of such gig workers. |
|
||
PART A: HIGHLIGHTS OF THE DRAFT BILL
Context
The platform and gig economy has witnessed rapid growth in recent years due to increased adoption of digital platforms that facilitate on-demand service delivery. Gig workers are primarily those engaged in work outside of a traditional employer-employee relationship.[1] Niti Aayog had estimated that in 2020-21, there were 77 lakh workers engaged in the gig economy in India.1 This is expected to increase to 2.35 crore by 2029-30.1 As of January 2022, Telangana had 10,536 gig and platform workers registered on the e-Shram portal.[2] E-shram portal was launched in 2021 to create a database of unorganised workers across sectors (including gig workers) to facilitate social security benefits.
In 2020, Parliament passed the Code on Social Security, 2020 which provides for regulation of gig and platform work.[3] According to the Code, a gig worker refers to a worker outside the traditional employer-employee relationship. A platform worker is also defined as a worker outside a traditional employer-employee relationship accessing work through an online platform. The Code provides for the constitution of a National Social Security Board to recommend and monitor social welfare schemes for gig, platform, and unorganised workers. The Union government announced healthcare coverage for gig-workers under the PM Jan Arogya Yojana and registration on the e-Shram portal under the 2025-26 union budget.[4] In 2019, the Union government introduced the PM Shram Yogi Maan-dhan Yojana which is an old age pension scheme for unorganised workers including gig and platform workers.[5]
A few states have introduced or are planning to introduce laws to regulate gig and platform work. In 2023, Rajasthan passed the Rajasthan Platform Based Gig Workers (Registration and Welfare) Act, 2023.[6] Karnataka and Jharkhand have circulated draft Bills to regulate gig work.[7],[8] These Bills provide for registration of gig workers and aggregators, and establish a Welfare Board and Fund to implement welfare schemes. The Labour Department of Telangana also circulated a draft Bill on April 15, 2025 for public comments.
Key features of the draft Bill include:
PART B: KEY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
Defining gig work
Definition of gig worker may cover a wide range of workers
The draft Bill defines a gig worker as a person who: (i) falls outside a traditional employer-employee relationship, (ii) works on the basis of terms and conditions specified in the contract, and (iii) is paid per output. A platform worker is a person undertaking work through an online platform. The draft Bill will apply to every gig and platform worker registered with the Board. While the definition of platform worker is restricted to work obtained through electronic platforms, the definition of a gig worker casts a much wider net. A gig worker may include a wide range of persons who may not be doing what is typically understood to be gig work (see section below). For example, this may include: a graphic designer hired by an organisation on contract basis and paid for a project, a performer contracted for an event, seeking the opinion of a doctor whose services were employed using a medical aggregator. Thus, all persons employing such workers will be liable to pay a welfare fee, and the social security schemes for gig workers will cover all such workers.
Challenges in defining gig work
The rise of digital platforms in recent years has changed how products and services are accessed and delivered, leading to an expansion of gig-based employment. Finding and performing jobs through such platforms is known as gig work.[9] However, a challenge with defining and regulating gig work is that it includes aspects of traditional employer-employee roles, contract work, and freelance work, all of which are regulated differently (see Table 1). The International Labour Organisation (2021) noted that the line between employment and self-employment has blurred due to technology.[10]
Certain features that distinguish gig work from traditional employment models include: (i) gig workers may enjoy flexibility in their work, (ii) employers may not exert sufficient control over the work, and (iii) there may not be a mutual obligation between the parties involved.[11] The draft Bill’s definition of gig work does not clearly provide for all these conceptual features. This may lead to lack of clarity on who is a gig worker.
There have been cases where contractual obligations placed on gig and platform workers by companies were found to be similar to the ones placed on traditional employees. For instance, the UK Supreme Court observed that Uber (a ride sharing company) exerts significant control on travel routes and fares.[12] It also deactivates a driver’s account if they do not accept specified number of rides. Consequently, the Court ruled that Uber drivers are workers, and not self-employed contractors.12 Similarly, in September 2024, the Karnataka High Court ruled that drivers using Ola (a ride sharing company) would be considered employees of the company.[13] The Court observed that the company controls all the aspects of the services including the fare, the route, and the devices used by the gig worker.13
Table 1: Comparison between different forms of work[14],[15],[16],[17]
Parameters |
Employer-Employee |
Contract labour |
Freelance work |
Gig work |
Engagement for employment |
Employment under a written contract, on a permanent basis. |
Engaged through a contractor/ agency, on negotiated terms. |
Engaged through online platforms, social media, referrals or directly. |
Engaged through platforms, on terms negotiated with the aggregator. |
Worker flexibility |
No flexibility in choosing location of work, projects and working hours. |
Limited flexibility in terms of deadlines, may choose their working hours (if not in a specific hourly role). |
Flexibility to build a client base on their own. Can choose their working hours, pay and projects. |
Can choose their working hours, location, projects. Platform may put constraints like performance ratings, commission, penalties. |
Control by the employer |
Direct control by employer, as per the employment agreement. |
Supervisory control of the employer. Contractor has ultimate control. |
Minimal control by the client. |
Ways of control include: (i) performance ratings, (ii) pricing system, and (iii) keeping location on during work hours. |
Primary source of income for employee/ worker |
Remuneration by employer. Employees cannot work for competitors. |
Can have multiple sources of income, if part-time contract. |
Multiple sources of income from different projects. |
Can have multiple sources of income if engaged with multiple platforms. |
Sources: Contract Labour Act, 1970; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; IAAI vs. International Air Cargo Workers’ Union (2009); A Framework for modern employment, House of Commons; Gig Economy, House of Lords; Gig Economy, Congressional Research Service; Rasier Operations BV v. E TU Inc. (2024); Freelance Platform Work in the Russian Federation, ILO; PRS.
In some countries, courts have assessed the status of gig workers by closely examining the specific facts of each case and the actual functioning of the business. Some examples of other jurisdictions defining gig work include:
UK: The UK Supreme Court ruled that Uber drivers should be classified as workers and not self-employed contractors, citing the tight control which Uber exerts over its service.12 In contrast, due to their unlimited right of substitution, individuals working with Deliveroo were not recognized as workers.[18] The right of substitution is a key factor in evaluating employment status which provides for any person to delegate their work to a substitute.[19]
California, US: In 2020, California introduced legislation establishing the ABC test to assess whether a worker is an independent contractor. [20],[21] Under this law, all individuals providing labour for compensation are presumed to be employees unless the hiring entity can demonstrate that: (i) the worker operates independently of the company’s control, (ii) the task performed falls outside the entity’s usual business, and (iii) the worker is engaged in an independent business of the same nature.20
European Union: In December 2023, the European Union countries agreed on a Bill to regulate gig work. The Bill presumes an employer-employee relationship between a worker and a platform company, if the conditions of direction and control by the employer are met. The burden of proving that the contractual relationship in question is not an employment relationship is on the employer.[22],[23]
Australia: Australia categorises workers as employees and independent contractors. While gig workers were initially classified as independent contractors, recent High Court rulings have raised concerns over potential misclassification. It emphasized that the terms of the contract will be the primary basis for determining a worker’s classification.[24]
Financing social security benefits
The draft Bill provides for a welfare fund fee to be paid by aggregators and platforms. This will go into the Welfare Fund. This fund will also receive contributions from the workers, and the government. The question is who should cover the cost of funding social security for gig and platform workers.
In other countries, social security is financed through different models including contributions by the state, the employer, and employees (see Table 2). In India, under the Employees’ Provident Fund, both the employer and the employee contribute a certain percentage of the salary, whereas the Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme is fully funded by the government.[25] Some countries have come up with social security benefits for gig workers, since they are not classified as employees and traditional social security models may not apply to them.[26]
Table 2: International Comparison of financing models in relation to social security
Country |
Funding of social security |
Benefits for gig/platform workers |
Funding of gig workers benefits |
India |
Contributions by employers, employees, and the government25,[27] |
Should get social security benefits like maternity benefits, accident insurance, old age protections; benefit schemes to be notified by government3 |
Contributions by gig workers, aggregators and the government |
United Kingdom |
National insurance contributions by employers, employees, and tax revenue[28] |
Benefits based on employment status, self-employed workers can get some benefits like maternity benefits, state pension |
Self-employed gig workers pay certain types of national insurance contributions |
USA |
Contributions by employers, employees and self-employed, interest income from Social Security trust fund investments[29] |
Social security (includes old age and disability insurance) and Medicare (hospital insurance) for self employed |
Contributions by self-employed under Self-Employment Contributions Act |
Australia |
Public funds for welfare of persons unable to support themselves due to age, unemployment; mandatory contribution by employer, employee for superannuation |
Entitled to superannuation if worker meets definition of employee under the Superannuation Law |
The platform will be required to make superannuation payments if worker meets the required definition. |
Singapore |
Contributions by employers and employees, state contributes in some cases (like low wage workers) |
Work injury compensation, Central Provident Fund contributions |
Contributions by platforms and workers to the Central Provident Fund |
Sources: Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (India); Code on Social Security, 2020 (India); Social security rights in the UK, European Commission, 2011; Employment Status, Research Briefing, House of Commons Library, 2024; Social Security: The Trust Funds, Library of Congress, 2024 (USA); Self-employment tax (Social Security and Medicare taxes), USA; Australia's social security system, Senate Standing Committee on Community Affairs, Parliament of Australia, 2024; Conditions and pay information for gig workers, Government of Victoria (Australia); Social Insurance Code (2010:110), Sweden, 2010; Thematic Report on Financing Social Protection: Sweden, European Commission, 2019; Platform Workers Act, 2024 (Singapore); Central Provident Fund Act, 1953 (Singapore); PRS.
Usage of the welfare fund fee
Under the draft Bill, a welfare fund fee will be collected from aggregators and platforms. It will be between one to two percent of the payout of the gig worker in each transaction. Failure to pay this fee will attract an interest on the amount due. It will also be punishable with imprisonment for up to a year, or a fine up to two lakh rupees, or both.
The draft Bill suggests that the state government will notify social security schemes for Gig and Platform workers. However, it does not specify various welfare entitlements available for gig workers, and factors on which social security payouts will depend. The Code on Social Security, 2020 offers provisions for gig and platform workers to receive benefits like maternity leave, sickness and disability support, and old age protection.[30]
Failure to pay the welfare fund fee is deemed a criminal offence
According to the draft Bill, if the aggregator/primary employer fails to pay the welfare fund fee, they must pay an additional interest amount. Failure to pay the welfare fund fee by the shall be punishable with imprisonment for up to one year, or a fine of up to two lakh rupees, or both. The question is whether such failure should be treated as a criminal offence, or as a civil one.
In various other laws, similar lapses are penalised with civil penalties. Several states have created Labour Welfare Funds, which are statutory funds managed by the state government for the benefit of workers.[31] These are funded by contributions from employees and employers. Under these Labour Welfare Fund Acts, if an employer fails to pay the required contributions, they are liable to pay an additional interest amount.31 Under the Income Tax Act, 1961, failure to deduct tax at source would result in a penalty equal to the tax amount which such person failed to deduct or pay.[32] According to the Union Ministry of Finance, criminalising minor non-compliances increases burden on businesses.[33] Parliament also passed the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023, to decriminalise certain offences across 42 Acts to promote ease of doing business.
Comparison of state laws
The table below provides a comparison of the draft Telangana Bill with similar Bills in other states.
Table 3: State wise comparison of gig workers laws
Feature |
Telangana (draft Bill) |
Karnataka (draft Bill) |
Jharkhand (draft Bill) |
Rajasthan (Act) |
Definition of Gig Worker |
Work arrangement falling outside the traditional employer-employee relationship.
|
Work through online platform, with pay determined by terms and conditions. |
Work falls outside the traditional employer-employee relationship, obtained through an online platform, contractual, piece-rate. |
Same as Jharkhand. |
Definition of Platform Worker |
Persons obtaining work through an online platform. |
Has not distinguished between a gig worker and platform worker. |
Same as Karnataka. |
Same as Karnataka. |
Rights of a Gig Worker |
Registration, social security schemes, and grievance redressal mechanism. |
Registration, social security schemes, and grievance redressal mechanism. |
Same as Karnataka. |
Registration, social security schemes, grievance redressal mechanism, participation in board discussions. |
Registration of gig workers |
Self-registration as prescribed. Aggregators to provide database of workers registered with them within 60 days from commencement of the Act. |
Workers must be registered by aggregators within 60 days from commencement of the Act. |
Same as Karnataka. |
Same as Karnataka. |
Registration of aggregators |
Aggregators must register with the board within 45 days from the commencement of the Act. |
Aggregators must register with the board within 60 days from commencement of the Act. |
Same as Karnataka. |
Same as Karnataka. |
Transparency in Algorithm |
Aggregators must inform the platform and gig workers about the procedure to seek information on the automated monitoring and decision making system that affects their work. |
Aggregators must inform workers about: (i) rating systems, (ii) worker classification, (iii) use of personal data, and algorithms affecting work conditions. |
Same as Karnataka. |
No provision for transparency in automated monitoring and decision-making systems. |
Termination of Work |
Reason for termination must be given in writing, with a seven-day prior notice. |
Reasons must be included in the contract, and a 14-day prior notice. |
Same as Karnataka. |
No provision for termination of work. |
Grievance Redressal |
Grievances can be filed via a portal or through an officer. Order within 30 days. |
Grievances can be filed via a portal or an officer. Appeals within 90 days. |
Same as Karnataka. |
Same as Karnataka. |
Welfare Fee |
Between one to two per cent of the individual payout to the gig and platform worker, paid by the aggregator quarterly. |
Based on worker pay per transaction or aggregator turnover, paid quarterly. |
Percentage of transaction value, as specified by state government. |
Same as Jharkhand. |
Sources of Fund |
Welfare fund fee, contributions by platform and gig workers, grants-in-aid from the centre and state government, CSR fund, grants, gifts, or donations. |
Welfare fee, contributions by platform-based gig workers, grants-in-aid from both Central and State Government, grants, bequests or transfers. |
Same as Karnataka. |
Welfare fee, grants-in-aid from State Government, any other sources. |
Usage of fund |
Not specified |
Prescribed by the state government |
Prescribed by the state government |
Prescribed by the state government |
Sources: The Draft Telangana Gig and Platform Workers (Registration, Social Security, and Welfare) Bill, 2025; The Draft Karnataka Platform Based Gig Workers (Social Security and Welfare) Bill, 2024; The Draft Jharkhand Platform based Gig Workers (Registration and Welfare) Bill, 2024; Rajasthan Platform Based Gig Workers (Registration and Welfare) Act, 2023; PRS.
[1]. India’s Booming Gig and Platform Economy, Niti Aayog, June 2022, .
[2]. Unstarred Question No. 2494, Rajya Sabha, Ministry of Labour and Employment, March 24, 2022, .
[3]. Code on Social Security, 2020, .
[4]. Budget Speech, Union Budget 2025-26, .
[5]. “Labour welfare and social security in the informal and gig economy”, Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Labour and Employment, November 25, 2024, .
[6]. Rajasthan Platform Based Gig Workers (Registration and Welfare) Act, 2023, //crickexcasinos.com/files/Bills_acts/acts_states/rajasthan/2023/Act29of2023Rajasthan.pdf.
[7]. Draft Karnataka Platform Based Gig Workers (Social Security and Welfare) Bill, 2024, .
[8]. Jharkhand Platform Based Gig Workers (Registration and Welfare) Act, 2024, .
[9]. Gig Economy: Introduction, Library Briefings, House of Lords, UK Parliament, November 21, 2017, .
[10]. Platform Work and the Employment Relationship, Working Paper, International Labour Organisation, 2021, .
[11]. Employment Status, Research Briefings, House of Commons Library, July 12, 2024,
[12]. Uber BV and others (Appellants) v Aslam and others (Respondents), [2018] EWCA Civ 2748, February 19, 2021, .
[13]. Writ Petition No. 8127 of 2019, High court of Karnataka, September 30, 2024.
[14]. Silver Jubilee Tailoring House v. Chief Inspector of Shops and Establishments, Supreme Court of India, September 25, 1973, .
[15]. Appeal (civil) 1351-53 of 2002, Workmen of Nilgiri Coop. Mkt. Society Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors., Supreme Court of India, February 5, 2004, .
[16]. Employment status and employment rights, Government of United Kingdom, August 30, 2024, .
[17]. Employer-Employee relationship. U.S. Department of Labour, .
[18]. Independent Workers Union of Great Britain (Appellant) v Central Arbitration Committee and another (Respondents), [2021] EWCA Civ 952, April 25 and 26, 2023, .
[19]. Employment Status Manual, UK Government, November 2, 2023, .
[20]. Section 2, AB-2257 Worker classification, California Legislative Assembly, .
[21]. ABC Test, Labor and Workforce Department Agency, State of California,
[22]. “Platform work: new rules on employment status”, European Parliament, December 13, 2023, .
[23]. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving working conditions in platform work, European Union, October 2, 2024, .
[24]. ‘Regulating the gig economy as a form of employment’, Parliament of Australia, .
[25]. Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
[26]. Protecting Workers in New Forms of Employment: Paper prepared for the BRICS Employment Working Group meeting under China’s Presidency, International Labour Organisation, April 2022, .
[27]. Atal Pension Yojana – Details of the scheme, .
[28]. Your social security rights in the United Kingdom, European Commission, December 2010, .
[29]. Social Security: The Trust Funds, Congressional Research Service, Updated May 23, 2024, .
[30]. Section 114 (1), Section 114(4), The Code on Social Security, 2020, .
[31]. The Punjab Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1965, ; The Karnataka Labour Welfare Fund, 1965, .
[32]. The Income Tax Act, 1961, .
[33]. “Decriminalisation of Minor Offences For Improving Business Sentiment And Unclogging Court Processes”, Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, June 12, 2020, .
DISCLAIMER: This document is being furnished to you for your information. You may choose to reproduce or redistribute this report for non-commercial purposes in part or in full to any other person with due acknowledgement of PRS Legislative Research (“PRS”). The opinions expressed herein are entirely those of the author(s). PRS makes every effort to use reliable and comprehensive information, but PRS does not represent that the contents of the report are accurate or complete. PRS is an independent, not-for-profit group. This document has been prepared without regard to the objectives or opinions of those who may receive it.